kristyn winters

30 September 2008

Kathleen Norris and Acedia

Friday night I had the privilege of hearing Kathleen Norris read and answer questions at The Tattered Cover.  It was a delight.  At one point, I was one of a few people in the room with her before the reading got started and the room filled up.  On a side note, it’s a strange experience realizing that a physical presence is the same person that wrote the words in a book you’ve read.  Reading can be intimate, so trying to understand that a real person made that possible is just wild.

I did not find myself wishing I had kept the real person separate from the writing.  She is a lovely person, at least in the small time I was in the same room as her.  She was down to earth, sincere, funny, and smart.  She provided intelligent answers to each question, but also used words like “crazy” and “cool.”  Even my sister who has not read her books enjoyed the reading.

A few people asked about compassion fatigue, her research methods/habits, acedia and the quotidian, and more.  Acedia is an even more interesting word and condition than I had previously thought.  What’s fascinating is that the quotidian can be both a remedy and a source of acedia.  She discussed how those afflicted with acedia don’t care and don’t care that they don’t care, so naturally, the monotonous everyday tasks of cleaning and cooking and making the bed and brushing one’s teeth seem pointless.  Yet to crawl out of acedia one must do those very things.  This is something I’ll have to explore, since lately I’ve had a hard time wanting to live in a clean apartment but not caring enough to actually clean (until recently).  A lot of times I use the “what’s the point” question to evaluate certain tasks, and it’s easy to rationalize not doing so many things.

Kathleen talked about the connections between the individual’s experience with acedia and our society today.  There is so much to care about, so often we tune out and can only respond with apathy.  This is where the question of compassion fatigue provided some interesting implications of acedia.  For those who spend their lives caring about/for others or certain issues, all the effort in the world can feel pointless when one does not see results.  It’s easy to slip into acedia as a result.

When asked about her research methods/habits, she said they’re haphazard and she just reads a lot.  She doesn’t consider herself well educated or a scholar, yet she’s extremely intelligent.  I love this because she provides an example of a literary life without all the advanced degrees.  Every week I convince myself of a new degree I should get simply because I’m curious about those subjects, but in the end, I realize that the library books I read will provide a pretty fantastic education all the same.  (Not that I’m saying one can substitute a formal education with library books; rather, we can receive a good foundation from books.)

I haven’t started Acedia & me yet, but I’m a little familiar with some of the ideas.  She said that a lot of what’s in The Quotidian Mysteries is in this new book, and since I loved The Quotidian Mysteries, I’m pretty excited.  I highly recommend picking up one of her books.

26 September 2008

Liturgy and Lauren Winner

For some time now, I’ve felt a longing for liturgy.  Is that possible?

I’d say it began a little over two years ago when I started attending my current church.  They integrated elements of liturgy and ancient Christian practices/rituals into the service.  However, that has since changed, and I find myself wishing for a place that incorporates liturgy in a visible way, but I don’t know if it’s an important enough reason to consider finding a different church.

If I’m honest, I must admit that I don’t fully understand what liturgy means, the word itself and its manifestations.  I’ve been stalking its meaning in earnest.  When I read three of Lauren Winner’s books last year, I saw the richness of experience secondhand.  She went from Jewish to Orthodox Jew to Christian, and in describing this process in her book Girl Meets God, she touched on liturgy in the Jewish tradition and a little bit in the Christian tradition.

Last November a friend mentioned a book called A More Profound Alleluia, which explains the liturgical elements in churches today.  I think.  I haven’t read it yet, though I mean to.  So I wonder how much of my longing is for liturgy and how much is for inclusion in a communion of saints, so to speak.

At my grandfather’s funeral in January, so many elements of a Catholic mass came back to me, even though my family left the Catholic church when I was still in elementary school.  There’s a part of me that wants to cling to my family heritage.

With the call-and-response, prayers, and daily readings, aren’t we joining in the Body of Christ?  I realize those are not the only way to do so, but as I read The Life You Save May Be Your Own, I can see how liturgy joins people in a unique way.

The three songs, sermon, and closing song routine of many churches today leaves me lacking.  Lacking what, I don’t know.

I realize that by even broaching the topic of liturgy, I must evaluate the church today (and in history), and I am in way over my head in that area.  Many people have talked and written and ruminated about what church means and what it should look like and all the facets that go along with those questions.  The more I read, the more I notice that I’m not alone (although I know few real life people who share my longing).  As I explore the intersection of faith and art, I find others out there who express interest in liturgy.  The established writers who have informed my developing idea of faith and art are/have been largely part of liturgical traditions.  But what does this mean?

These topics are all bound up in what it means to be Christian and creative.  I suppose I have not answered any questions in my sprawling, thinking-out-loud writing.  I am infinitely curious, and that usually leads to more questions and rarely any answers.  I suppose I’m writing this right now to ask if anyone else out there is curious about faith and art, or longs for liturgy, or wonders what the church should look like.

25 September 2008

The Lighter Side: Gender, Women’s Magazines, and Marriage

Filed under: commentary — Tags: , , , — kristyn @ 12:30 pm

This week I’ve been researching magazine markets. During my day designated for women’s magazine, I perused Glamour’s website and found this: a newly married man writing about marriage for a women’s magazine. I rarely read women’s magazines (nothing against them), but it was interesting, especially because I am also newly married (coming up on six months). Although his world is different from mine, I noticed some similar experiences. And since I’ve been married for almost six months, I started thinking about the transition from the single life to the married one.

The “h” word is still strange to me. I have a particular aversion to the word “woman,” and doubt I’ll ever feel comfortable calling myself that. And, although I have nothing against the name, and yes, I did choose to take it, I have a hard time saying my married name. Even with this blog, I can’t get used to it. (At a recent race, when asked for my name at the check in table, I couldn’t get it out, and had to show them my membership card instead.) I like my maiden name. I don’t want to get used to a new one. But after a lot of thinking, I figured unity in name (not to mention avoiding confusion) mattered more to me than retaining my old one. And don’t get me started on the “Mrs.” prefix. No wonder so many adult women insist on being called by their first name.

Speaking of Running (and goals)

Filed under: Time, commentary, running — Tags: — kristyn @ 6:37 am

Writing about regular races got me to thinking about goals.  I used to have ambitious goals.  Lately I’m a bit scared of dreaming or expecting much.  Fear of failure perhaps.  Inevitable disappointments from adult life.

In college I spent way too much time thinking and reading about running, and, oh yes, doing a bit of that actual running.  During boring classes my freshman year I made a list of running goals.  I wanted to run a sub-20 5k and a marathon by age 21 or at least before age 22 (that seemed like an eternity away).  Well, that has certainly passed, and so has a good chunk of prime running years.  I don’t know if the first goal is possible but the second one sure is.  That’s not the problem, though.

As with running, I’ve noticed how I neglect goal-making in other areas.  I hesitate to “dream big” or create elaborate plans.  Do we lose our youthful sense of possibility as we age?  Or does reality kick in a little too hard?  Or maybe it’s just me, not we.

All I’ve ever learned about setting goals insists that you must simultaneously be realistic and challenging.  But what if our sense of realistic has shriveled?

Though it’s been said before, I’ll say it again:  At one point, most people thought it impossible to break the 4:00 barrier in the mile.

I invite you to join me in dreaming and resisting the temptation to settle.  Here is a tool that may prove helpful:

24 September 2008

Running Regulars

Filed under: running — Tags: , , , , , — kristyn @ 3:27 pm

There’s an article about the 30th Bolder Boulder over at Running Times. I missed it this year, as well as in 2006. It used to be one of my regular races. Aside from the 10k at 10,000 feet in Vail, it’s the only 10k I’ve run in the nearly eight years I’ve been running. What do you think about regular races?

There were a few years when I ran between five and ten races a year, which is not much compared to high school cross country or those who compete weekly. Racing is fun and lends shape to one’s training, but sometimes it interferes. And besides, it’s costly. It’s hard for me to pay to race if I can’t run fast. But I haven’t been in my best racing shape in, oh, four or five years. (Where has the time gone?)

This year I’ve tried to get back into racing with inexpensive options. On the 13th, I ran an 8 mile race even though I was certainly not in shape to race it. It was fun and a great opportunity to practice pushing myself. Now I want to race a 5k, but I don’t want racing to interfere with building a solid base. I’m thinking November. A PR would be well overdue (try five years and a few odd months), but I won’t expect it.

So while it’s fun to create traditions, to come back to a familiar race each year, it’s also worthwhile to try new races. New sounds perfect now.

22 September 2008

Noteworthy Links

After a week, the articles keep coming and there’s a DFW mention on the NY Times book review podcast this week.

A few great people will be at The Tattered Cover this week!

Read a few articles (sort of reviews) of Kathleen Norris’s new book and an excerpt.

The Boulder (Backroads) Marathon was yesterday. I completely forgot. The race used to take place the last Sunday in September, but they’ve made some changes. It looks like they cleared up issues from the 2007 race. Each year I tell myself I’m going to run the half again or try the marathon. Five years later and I’ve still only run it once. You can read this blogger’s account of the 2008 race, along with a letter from the race director.

18 September 2008

Marilynne Robinson’s Home

On Sunday I finished the last 50 pages of Home. I was stunned and saddened by the news of David Foster Wallace’s death, so reading seemed like all I could do. I liked this book more than Gilead, even though it seems like the critics have their qualms. The character of Jack is much more interesting in Home, and I enjoyed spending time with Glory. I’d recommend it over Gilead, but if you only read one Marilynne Robinson book, read Housekeeping.

I’ve noticed I’ve spent a lot of blog space writing about Marilynne Robinson’s books, even though I wouldn’t list her among my favorite writers. And as much as I’ve written about her lately, Housekeeping is the only book that affected me in any real way; the others I could take or leave. This gets me thinking about why I read the books I do and which ones become favorites. I tend to prefer books for the language, ideas, and characters, in that order usually.

Some read for the story, as in “that was a great story,” but I don’t think the actual story of a book matters much. As a writer this is difficult terrain for me, though, because there has to be a plot or some kind of tension in the book. I think it matters how one tells the story–the techniques, the language, the ideas, the characters, the overall effect. I love DeLillo for his ideas and language, Fitzgerald for his language and a je ne sais quai, Kingsolver for the ideas and stories and language, O’Connor for her sort of smack-you-in-the-head irony and weirdness and the location and feel of her stories, Lorrie Moore for her language and wit, and I could go on, but I’ll keep citing language and ideas as the factors that draw me in to a story.

Right now I have too many books going on, several of them nonfiction, but who knows when the next favorite will emerge.

17 September 2008

Freelance Goals and Objectives

Filed under: Work, writing — Tags: , , — kristyn @ 10:14 am

It’s important with any business to create a business plan.  However, it’s all too easy to go overboard with that plan or to delay beginning your work until you’ve got all the particulars aligned.

Stop that.

I’ve written before about returning to the basics, but here I would like to suggest a simple starting point:

Even if you don’t have a mission statement or clarifying sentence for your business, write out a list of goals and objectives.  For me, it’s as simple as five daily/weekly tasks.  I gave myself a guideline for how many days I’ll work each week, then divided the tasks into daily and weekly categories.  For example:

  1. Work X days per week.
  2. Send out X number of query letters per day.
  3. Send out X number of essays or short stories per day or week.
  4. Write X number of words per day (for me this is fiction).
  5. Follow-up.

Then I created three simple monthly objectives and a few overall notes for myself.  I have the printed version, a 4 1/4 inch by 11 inch paper, affixed at my work station.  This provides me with a reminder of my goals and a starting point each day.  I tend to take off in too many directions without completing enough projects.  Then I get overwhelmed by my ambitions.  So this simple goals and objectives sheet allows me to simplify and take it one step at a time.

Some people prefer production goals, while others work best with time goals.  I like a combination of the two.  What tricks do you use to stay (or get) on track?

16 September 2008

The Life You Save May Be Your Own

Originally the title of a Flannery O’Connor short story, Paul Elie reclaimed it for his book about the lives of said writer, as well as Dorothy Day, Thomas Merton, and Walker Percy. The book, as far as I can tell right now, is one part biography, one part social history, and another part an examination of faith and art in the lives of these four people. Elie writes in a braided essay fashion of sorts, weaving in a story about one only to bring in a thread of the next one’s life. I can’t wait to see how they converge.

So far, it’s fascinating. I try to read books like this (i.e., history, door-stopper nonfiction works, and the like) occasionally, but never really get into them. I enjoy learning, and want to finish the books, but lack the momentum to carry me through the often hundreds or thousands of pages.

This one is different, though. It’s enthralling. It’s gripping. I couldn’t put it down this morning. Elie’s got me thinking about the early 1900s and remembering my love of history.

Dorothy Day’s life is fascinating. I feel a sort of affinity with her and these writers when Elie mentions Day devouring Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and other Russian authors. I can’t imagine what it would have been like to have lived during the time of the Russian Revolution. The way these writers soaked up books, in a religious sort of devotion, inspires me. It seems as though books had a higher authority then than they do now. I’m excited to read about the next turns in their lives.

15 September 2008

David Foster Wallace, 1962-2008

I don’t know about you, but I am in a state of shock. Like this:

“All I know right now is this: that any premature death is the source of great sorrow, intensely so for family and friends; and that this morning I am experiencing bewildering emotions: grief, for a man I never knew except through his words; and loss, for the words which he did not have time to write.”

Read the rest here.

What a tragedy to see the death of such a brilliant thinker, one of the most influential writers of this generation. How are we to react when a person that so many admired for his ideas and talent dies this kind of death? It’s hard enough when it’s any other kind of death, but suicide is such a lonely death. David Foster Wallace has inspired and influenced so many people. This is the kind of thing that makes one question life and death and writing and what we think about everything. I don’t consider myself to be among his biggest fans, but I’ve seen his influence on people. His fan website is enough to attest to the way he affected people.

There are already tons of articles mentioning various essays, short stories, interviews, and his address at Kenyon College–all looking for clues. When a person has a public persona, it’s difficult to comprehend the personal life and all that we don’t know about that person. History’s being written right now, and what’s sad is that his death will no doubt inform how people think of his life and read his books.

Read more here (but watch out for the last line of Infinite Jest at the end of this article), here, here, here, and here.

I suppose David Foster Wallace’s death reminds us of how temporary we are, and that even brilliant people die.

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.